Trabecular Morphometric Parameters of the Jaw Bone Assessed by Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Normal Subjects, With Low Bone Mass With and Without Specific Treatments. Preliminary Study

Main Article Content

María E. Avendano
Walther Zabala
Susana Zeni

Abstract

Introduction: antiresorptive treatments such as bisphosphonates and denosumab are widely used to prevent bone loss, although their effects on mandibular microarchitecture are not yet fully established. Cone-beam computed tomography allows a noninvasive evaluation of trabecular structure and may help detect early alterations associated with bone fragility or antiresorptive therapy.


Materials and methods: preliminary study in 45 postmenopausal women (>55 years), classified into a control group with normal bone mineral density and groups with osteopenia or osteoporosis, according to the treatment received Standardized mandibular cone-beam computed tomography scans were obtained, and three regions of interest were analyzed per patient. Trabecular thickness, trabecular separation, bone volume fraction, anisotropy, and connectivity were assessed using BoneJ (ImageJ). The Shapiro–Wilk test was applied, and depending on distribution, the T test or Mann–Whitney test was used (p<0.05). All participants provided informed consent. The study followed the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the corresponding ethics committee.


Results: untreated osteopenic women showed lower trabecular thickness and connectivity and greater trabecular separation compared with the control group (p<0.05). Patients treated with calcium, vitamin D, or hormone therapy showed no significant differences compared with the control group. Both patients treated with BPs and those treated with DMAb exhibited greater trabecular thickness and connectivity than the untreated osteopenic group (p<0.05), reaching values similar to those observed in the control group. However, trabecular separation remained elevated in sin patients with osteopenia or osteoporosis, irrespective of the treatment received.


Conclusion: cone-beam computed tomography identified mandibular microstructural changes associated with bone fragility and antiresorptive treatments. These findings suggest that this technique may be useful for the early detection of alterations with clinical implications for dental planning.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Avendano ME, Zabala W, Zeni S. Trabecular Morphometric Parameters of the Jaw Bone Assessed by Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Normal Subjects, With Low Bone Mass With and Without Specific Treatments. Preliminary Study. Actual. Osteol. [Internet]. 2026 Aug. 1 [cited 2026 Aug. 1];22(1):6-17. Available from: https://ojs.osteologia.org.ar/ojs33010/index.php/osteologia/article/view/727
Section
Original Articles

References

Camacho PM, Petak SM, Binkley N, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis-2020 update. Endocr Pract 2020;26(Suppl 1):1-46. https://doi.org/10.4158/GL-2020-0524SUPPL.

Lu J, Hu D, Zhang Y, et al. Current comprehensive understanding of denosumab (the RANKL neutralizing antibody) in the treatment of bone metastasis of malignant tumors, including pharmacological mechanism and clinical trials. Front Oncol 2023;13:1133828. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1133828.

Kuroshima S, Al-Omari FA, Sasaki M, et al. Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: A literature review and update. Genesis 2022;60(8-9):e23500. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.23500.

Eshaghi M, Ganji F, Shaki H, et al. Targeting bone in cancer therapy: Advances and challenges of bisphosphonate-based drug delivery systems. ADMET DMPK 2025;13(3):2756. https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.2756.

Flanagan AM, Chambers TJ. Inhibition of bone resorption by bisphosphonates: interactions between bisphosphonates, osteoclasts, and bone. Calcif Tissue Int 1991;49(6):407-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02555852.

Drake MT, Clarke BL, Khosla S. Bisphosphonates: mechanism of action and role in clinical practice. Mayo Clin Proc 2008;83(9):1032-45. https://doi.org/10.4065/83.9.1032.

Dore RK. The RANKL pathway and denosumab. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2011;37(3):433-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdc.2011.07.004.

Li N, Chu N, Zhu L, et al. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and immunogenicity of HLX14 versus reference denosumab in healthy males: A randomized phase I study. Clin Transl Sci 2024;17(12):e70089. https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.70089.

Ruggiero SL, Dodson TB, Aghaloo T, Carlson ER, Ward BB, Kademani D, et al. American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons' Position Paper on Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws-2022 Update. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022;80(5):920-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2022.02.008.

Lyu H, Jundi B, Xu C, et al. Comparison of Denosumab and Bisphosphonates in Patients With Osteoporosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2019;104(5):1753-65. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2018-02236.

Jelin-Uhlig S, Weigel M, Ott B, et al. Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and oral microbiome: Clinical risk factors, pathophysiology and treatment options. Int J Mol Sci 2024;25(15):8053. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25158053.

Schoenhof R, Munz A, Yuan A, et al. Microarchitecture of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ); a retrospective micro-CT and morphometric analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2021;49(6):508-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2021.02.01.

Chavassieux P, Portero-Muzy N, Roux JP, et al. Reduction of cortical bone turnover and erosion depth after 2 and 3 years of denosumab: Iliac bone histomorphometry in the FREEDOM trial. J Bone Miner Res 2019;34(4):626-631. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3631.

Stein A, Levit M, Shah H, et al. Menopause-related changes to maxillary trabecular bone micro-architecture. Front Aging 2025;6:1589708. https://doi.org/10.3389/fragi.2025.1589708.

Most read articles by the same author(s)