Postoperative assessment in computer assisted selection of femur osteoarticular allograft

Main Article Content

Federico Edgardo Milano
José Ignacio Albergo
Germán Luis Farfalli
Luis Alberto Aponte-Tinao
Miguel Ángel Ayerza
Domingo Luis Muscolo
Lucas Eduardo Ritacco

Abstract

The aim of our study was to compare two groups of patients treated with distal femur osteoarticular allograft in terms of: 1) the volume of the distal femur of the allograft and patient, 2) the articular surface contact, 3) the anatomical femoral valgus angle. Material and methods: a retrospective review was performed between 2002 and 2012 and all patients with an osteo-articular allograft of the distal femur were analysed. A total of 32 patients were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the selection method of the allograft: Group 1 16 patients with allograft selected by 2D (CT) and Group 2, 16 patients selected through a 3D method. The evaluation was done by an independent and blind observer. Results: the differences in terms of volume estimation and joint surface contact between the donor allograft and patient distal femur were not statistically significant (p>0.05). However, the difference between the valgus angle showed differences between donor and patient femurs selected by the 2D method (p<0.05) but no difference in the group of patients selected by 3D method (p>0.05). Conclusion: the 3D method for allograft selection of the distal femur after bone sarcoma resection showed better results in limb alignment compared to 2D selection method.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Milano FE, Albergo JI, Farfalli GL, Aponte-Tinao LA, Ayerza M Ángel, Muscolo DL, Ritacco LE. Postoperative assessment in computer assisted selection of femur osteoarticular allograft. Actual. Osteol. [Internet]. 2024 Jul. 2 [cited 2024 Nov. 23];12(2):87-96. Available from: https://ojs.osteologia.org.ar/ojs33010/index.php/osteologia/article/view/301
Section
Original Articles